BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO ACCOMPANY
PRESS RELEASE
DfES funding for the Forum for Maintained Nursery Schools &
Children’s Centres ceases at the end of March. The funding will not
be renewed.
The Forum was set up in 2001 and
administered by The British Association for Early Childhood
Education (Early Education). It aimed to expose the extent to which
maintained nursery schools were already providing services to
support families in their communities and to assist them in
extending and developing these services in line with government
policy. It also aimed to highlight the distinctive approach to
learning and teaching within nursery schools and disseminate their
excellent practice, in order both to safeguard the schools and to
influence professional practice within the growing childcare sector.
The establishment of the Forum was one of several measures taken by
central government that demonstrated its strong commitment to
maintained nursery schools; others include a grant to LEAs provided
through Standards Fund; the reconstitution of nursery school
governing bodies with the same powers and fully delegated budgets as
all other schools, and the introduction of the ‘presumption against
closure’ of nursery schools. The DfES is presently looking to see
how the provisions of that ‘presumption’ can be strengthened.
Government commitment to the maintained nursery school sector has
been based on clear and consistent evidence about the quality of
learning in nursery schools and their potential contribution to
improving the quality of teaching and learning in all provision for
all children from birth to six.
The only major research projects available, the EPPE project
(Effective Provision of Pre-School Education ) and REPEY
(Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years) demonstrate that
it is within maintained nursery schools, and those integrated
centres which have grown around maintained nursery schools, that the
highest quality of learning is to be found and that this has a
continuing influence on young children’s intellectual and social
development, and their subsequent progress in school. The key factor
identified in the research that made for high quality was the
presence of a Head who was a qualified teacher and a good proportion
of qualified teachers on the staff. These findings are consistent
with those of longitudinal studies in other countries.
Maintained nursery schools are centres of a distinctive knowledge
and experience of child development, curriculum, pedagogy, learning
environment, observation and assessment, and of the evaluation of
learning and teaching. Awareness of issues of identity and diversity
have influenced work with young bilingual learners that has
developed over decades, and nursery schools have well established
systems to support the learning and development of young children
with special educational needs. The engagement and support of
parents and families has always been an integral part of nursery
education. All this was built up over a long time by teams of staff
working together with the space, time and resources that allowed
them to critically reflect upon and develop practice.
In spite of all this, the closure and amalgamation of maintained
nursery schools has continued, and in many local authorities they
have been overlooked as the base for extended services. The
expansion of the Children Centre programme has been accompanied by a
contraction of the number of nursery schools and a corresponding
withdrawal of government support for the Forum.
It is important to remember that the majority of all nursery schools
are in the 30% most disadvantaged wards. If education is driven out
of the Children Centre programme then the government’s declared
intention to improve the educational attainment and transform the
life chances of children who live in poverty will fail. If we
continue to close nursery schools we will lose the best model of
high quality care and education we have on which to build integrated
services.
Nursery schools should be in the vanguard of Children Centre
development, and their considerable resources actively deployed in
the interest of improving professional practice with young children
from birth to six. Without this there is a danger of perpetuating a
‘two-tier’ system of care and education, within which poor children
are doubly disadvantaged. Poor quality child care is not neutral in
its effect. We cannot afford not to do it well. For many years local
authority nursery schools have done it very well indeed. They have
admitted children from all backgrounds, employed well qualified
teachers and helped parents to understand how best to support their
children’s development. If Children’s Centres were to be built on
this model there might be a chance that initial inequalities could
be overcome.
Because of this, the Forum’s Steering Group is determined that the
withdrawal of DfES grant should not mean the end of the Forum. It
remains committed to developing effective practice within high
quality Children’s Centres. As a national organisation it is
uniquely placed to link the practice of the maintained nursery
schools and the former early excellence centres with that of the new
children’s centres. The membership of the Forum provides a rich
resource of expert knowledge and experience in early education and
care. Many members successfully run complex integrated centres and
have the will and commitment to raise standards for all children.
From April, 2006 the Forum plans to reinvent itself as an Open Forum
organising three day conferences a year (one a term) on issues of
importance to the development of children’s centres. It is hoped
that headteachers of nursery schools and heads of children’s centres
will attend.
SOME OF THE BEST SCHOOLS IN THE COUNTRY ARE CLOSING
SOME OF THE BEST SCHOOLS IN THE COUNTRY ARE CLOSING
 |